INTRO:
consequences mentioned in intro
criteria needs to evaluate alternatives and not problem
clearly state what we wish to improve
ALTERNATIVES:
listed
clearly state each alternative
The main goal of project mentioned in intro or as one alternative?
Jared is a reviewer not our audience
background on topic and no the assignment
rather than saying primary and secondary state as common topics
EX: categories such as technical feasibility, student complaints
clearly state why we are reviewing other universities
compare other universities in one paragraph in the results section
mention news articles, social media, article regarding registration
Mention how we are going to fix it properly
If your section has feedback... do it
Need to work on feedback as soon as possible
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.